RNC set to change GOP debate rules

Republican Presidential Debate Held at Dartmouth
Republican presidential candidates take the stage before a presidential debate sponsored by Bloomberg and The Washington Post held at Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire, Oct. 11, 2011. (AP Photo/Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg)

MEMPHIS, Tenn. (AP) — Lunging for control over the GOP ahead of high-stakes elections, the Republican National Committee was set Friday to end free-for-all presidential debates and threatened to ban potential contenders who participate in rogue forums.

At the same time, a political committee with deep ties to the Koch brothers has elected to spend $125 million on the battle for control of the Senate this fall, giving the 168-member central party meeting here a stark reminder that outside organizations will have significant sway over Republican political fortunes through the 2016 presidential race.

“At the RNC, we cannot control everything politics. But we have an important mission and we’re going to get the job done,” RNC Chairman Reince Priebus said as he opened the party’s meeting here on Friday.

As he spoke, reports circulated that Americans for Prosperity plans to escalate its television advertising across the nation, improve voter data collection and strengthen its 31-state ground operation. It was a bracing reality check for the RNC: Despite the committee’s efforts, the GOP establishment won’t be the only ones setting Republican priorities.

A senior official with direct knowledge of Americans For Prosperity’s plans confirmed the election blueprint, outlined in a memo distributed to Republican donors this spring. The official confirmed the memo’s authenticity, but wasn’t authorized to publicly discuss its contents.

Industrialist billionaires Charles and David Koch have already funneled millions to conservative causes. Democrats have roundly criticized the billionaires and claim Republican policies are being dictated by an agenda to grow the Kochs’ wealth.

The struggle to mend a party split between populist and establishment factions has hung over the meeting in Memphis, with RNC officials looking for ways to make it harder for weak but vocal candidates to prolong nomination fights, roil debates and jeopardize the party’s chances — again — of winning the Senate majority and the presidency.

On Thursday, the RNC rules panel endorsed the creation of a committee that would limit how many presidential debates can take place and who can ask the questions. The RNC measure affects only debates as candidates vie for the GOP nomination; the bipartisan Commission on Presidential Debates will still have final say on the elections between the Republican and Democratic nominees during the general election campaign.

But the RNC recommendation did take a step at reining the haphazard debate style that characterized the 2012 selection progress. The free-wheeling system provided a seemingly endless process of debates, from which former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney emerged as the party’s nominee, but only after weathering harsh criticism from his rivals.

“Spending too much time fighting with each other distracts the party from its ultimate goal, which is winning the presidency,” said Bruce Ash, chairman of the RNC’s rules committee. Others said the debate moderators during the 2012 were hostile to the GOP or were Democrats who wanted Obama to win a second term.

RNC committee member John Ryder said the party should have debates only with moderators who are Republicans or friendly to GOP causes, instead of “reading off talking points from (Obama campaign manager) Jim Messina and Obama for America.”

“That’s just not a good way to run a railroad or run a presidential primary,” said Ryder, the Tennessean who introduced the change.

But it was not going to be a unanimous decision, and several committee members said they were worried that activists might see their ability to prod candidates reduced under the new rule.

“You’re going to squelch the ability of candidates to get to know their voter base, and the voter base to get to know their candidates,” said Diana Orrock, a national committeewoman from Nevada. “As a voter…I want to see the good, the bad and the ugly.”

Randy Evans, a national committeeman from Georgia, said the party should still have rigorous primary debates to weed out weak candidates. Evans, an adviser to Newt Gingrich’s presidential campaign that he said “lived or died by debates,” also said these face-offs can help introduce under-funded candidates to voters.

“We want folks to be able to come from nowhere and have a chance to win,” said Evans.

The RNC rule does not explicitly pick debate moderators but its members were openly critical of CNN journalist Candy Crowley, who moderated a debate between Romney and Obama. During that debate, Crowley corrected Romney’s erroneous claim that Obama had not called the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, an act of terror.

Republicans, including Romney’s top aides, were furious that the moderator interjected herself into the debate as it was happening. It remains a point of frustration for GOP leaders.

Meanwhile, political operatives said Americans for Prosperity’s $125 million investment does not include as much as $30 million more that the group’s sister non-profit organization expects to spend on voter education efforts, which are designed to support conservative causes, but don’t necessarily advocate for specific legislation or candidates.

The senior official with knowledge of the memo, first reported by Politico, said the group has already spent more than $20 million this year ahead of the November midterm elections.


Peoples reported from Boston.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

WDTN.com provides commenting to allow for constructive discussion on the stories we cover. In order to comment here, you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our Terms of Service. Commenters who violate these terms, including use of vulgar language or racial slurs, will be banned. Please be respectful of the opinions of others and keep the conversation on topic and civil. If you see an inappropriate comment, please flag it for our moderators to review.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s