Attorney leans toward opposing trial move

Ray Tensing arrives at court on the fourth day of jury deliberations in his murder trial, Saturday, Nov. 12, 2016, in Cincinnati. Judge Megan Shanahan has declared a mistrial, after the jury said it was deadlocked in the case. Tensing, the former University of Cincinnati police officer is charged with murdering Sam DuBose while on duty during a routine traffic stop on July 19, 2015. (AP Photo/John Minchillo)

CINCINNATI (AP/WDTN) — The Hamilton County Prosecutor said Tuesday his office will retry the former University of Cincinnati police officer after a jury couldn’t agree on a verdict in the fatal shooting of a black man during a traffic stop.

Joe Deters also said he will be asking for a change of venue. Deters said Tuesday he would be okay with Columbus or Cleveland. He also mentioned the media in Cincinnati saying he wants a jury that “won’t be afraid to come out of the jury room.” Deters quipped, “I’ll go to Hawaii and try it.”

Attorney Stewart Mathews who represents Ray Tensing, says he doesn’t have an immediate position, but would lean toward keeping Ray Tensing’s trial in Hamilton County. Mathews says there are various reasons, including an “extreme hardship” logistically and financially to have the trial in another county.

Mathews had asked for a change of venue before the first trial, but notes a jury was seated. He says he doesn’t think moving the trial would have a huge impact on the case outcome.

Deters said, “It is our belief that the public attention that’s been focused on the Tensing case could have in fact seeped into the jury room and we’re going to try to alleviate that by moving the trial.”

Deters said, “It’s very rare that we retry these kinds of cases.” He said it is his belief that “Sam DuBose was murdered. Period.” Deters said DuBose may have gotten in trouble a lot but that doesn’t make his life any less relevant. “In the country that I love you don’t get shot in the head at a traffic stop,” said Deters.

You can watch the Prosecutor’s full statement here:

2 NEWS App users click here to watch the full statement

A judge declared a mistrial Nov. 12 when jurors deadlocked after deliberating some 25 hours on charges of murder and voluntary manslaughter in the July 2015 shooting of Sam DuBose.

Tensing’s attorney, Stewart Mathews, has asked the judge to acquit Tensing. He said Monday he expects Deters to retry Tensing on the same charges.

Tensing testified that he feared for his life when DuBose tried to drive away.

DuBose family members, the Cincinnati City Council and groups including faith leaders have pushed for a new murder trial.

RELATED: Family demands retrial in Cincinnati shooting

Prosecutors said repeatedly during the trial the evidence contradicted Tensing’s story. Deters said after the mistrial the jury was leaning toward a conviction on voluntary manslaughter.

RELATED: City Council wants ex-officer retried in fatal Ohio shooting

The jury of 10 whites and two blacks was seated Oct. 31 for the first trial.

To convict Tensing, now 27, of murder, jurors had to find he purposely killed DuBose, 43. The charge carries a possible sentence of 15 years to life in prison with conviction. The voluntary manslaughter charge means the killing happened during sudden passion or a fit of rage. That carries a possible sentence of three to 11 years.

Deters had said immediately after the trial that he expected to make his decision by Nov. 28 on whether to retry Tensing. That’s the date the judge set for a hearing in the case.

The case is one of several across the country calling attention to how police deal with blacks.

2 NEWS will continue to follow this story. We will keep you updated with the latest information as we learn it. You can get the latest information on and all the day’s events on 2 NEWS starting at 5. provides commenting to allow for constructive discussion on the stories we cover. In order to comment here, you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our Terms of Service. Commenters who violate these terms, including use of vulgar language or racial slurs, will be banned. Please be respectful of the opinions of others and keep the conversation on topic and civil. If you see an inappropriate comment, please flag it for our moderators to review.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s